Some authors base their characters off other's creations, while some think outside the box
and create their own masterpieces. While in some characters it is harder to see similarities or
differences, in others it is easy. Nearly all characters can be compared and contrasted, even if
it's as obvious as they're both human or neither of them owns a pet platypus.
Leonard Mead from "The Pedestrian" is a simple man who enjoys walking at night instead of
watching T.V.. Commander Barton is the captain of an EDS ship flying to deliver important
medicine to another planet in "The Cold Equations." Other than both they're stories are
futuristic, they don't seem very similar, but they are in some ways. Both characters don't like
the rules that have been set for them. Mead doesn't think he should go to jail for just walking
down the street after dark and Barton doesn't want to follow the law and kill a young stowaway
girl on his ship.
It is easy to see how the house from "There Will Come Soft Rains" and Henry from "The
Californian's Tale" are similar. They both are unable to understand that the people they are
missing aren't there anymore. Their lives go on just as if nothing had happened. The house
continues with its daily schedule thinking that its inhabitants are still living in it and actually
going along with the routine. Henry believes that his wife, who is most likely dead and has been
absent for 19 years, will be returning home shortly from a visit to her family. They are different
in that the house thinks that its missing people are still there and Henry who, except before
around the time of year that his wife had left and he still believes that she is at home with him,
knows she is gone but thinks she is still coming back.
Harrison Bergeron, from the short story of the same name, and the lawyer from "The Bet"
are also similar and different. They are the same because Harrison Bergeron does not want to
follow the rules made by the government, and believes that they are stupid, and the lawyer, at
the end of the story, believes that the laws made by our society are wrong. They both defy their
societies and openly oppose them. However, Harrison is against society even in the beginning
because he wants to be the best as he thinks he rightfully should be, whereas the lawyer comes
to a deeper understanding of life by the story's end and throws away his old life and the
accepted ways for an as worthwhile and meaningful life as he can have in this world.
Almost all characters can be compared or contrasted. For some, the points may be blatantly
obvious, but you can dig deeper than just external attributes, and find more meaning in them.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Thursday, October 9, 2008
"The Son From America"
Symbols - The money and Samuel's way of life represents how Samuel has changed since moving to America and new things. Berl and Berlcha symbolize the old ways of living and contentedness.
Plot - Exposition: We are introduced to Berl and his wife and the setting.
Inciting Event: Samuel arrives in Lentshin.
Rising Action: Samuel tries to help his mom with preparing for the Sabbath and they celebrate the Sabbath together.
Climax: Samuel asks his dad where the money is and he shows him.
Falling Action: Samuel talks to the old man in the synagogue.
Resolution: Samuel realizes you don't need money to be happy and Berlcha sings holy rhymes at the end of the story.
Protagonist - Samuel
Antagonist - Samuel
Conflict - Person vs. Self.
Summary - The story opens in the little village of Lentshin, Poland in the 1800s. We are introduced to Berl, an old traditional Jewish farmer, and his wife, Berlcha. They have a small farm and produce enough profit to be healthy, content, and keep their standard of living. Forty years ago, their then fifteen-year-old son, Samuel, had moved to America. Samuel has his own family now and even grandchildren that they did not know. Samuel sends his parents money every month but they do nothing with it, except save it in an old boot under the bed. One day, Samuel decides to visit his parents and sends them a cable, which they never receive. He shows up and unknowingly surprises his parents who are ecstatic at seeing him. Samuel asks what his parents did with the money he sent him and Berl shows him where they keep it. Samuel is shocked and asks why and they tell him that they don't need the money. While in Lentshin, Samuel tries to find a need for the money but is unsuccessful. Everyone is happy to keep living their uneventful lives and simply live on what they have and what God has already provided for them.
Theme - Not everyone needs or wants money to be happy and people can just simply be content with where they are and what their lives are.
Plot - Exposition: We are introduced to Berl and his wife and the setting.
Inciting Event: Samuel arrives in Lentshin.
Rising Action: Samuel tries to help his mom with preparing for the Sabbath and they celebrate the Sabbath together.
Climax: Samuel asks his dad where the money is and he shows him.
Falling Action: Samuel talks to the old man in the synagogue.
Resolution: Samuel realizes you don't need money to be happy and Berlcha sings holy rhymes at the end of the story.
Protagonist - Samuel
Antagonist - Samuel
Conflict - Person vs. Self.
Summary - The story opens in the little village of Lentshin, Poland in the 1800s. We are introduced to Berl, an old traditional Jewish farmer, and his wife, Berlcha. They have a small farm and produce enough profit to be healthy, content, and keep their standard of living. Forty years ago, their then fifteen-year-old son, Samuel, had moved to America. Samuel has his own family now and even grandchildren that they did not know. Samuel sends his parents money every month but they do nothing with it, except save it in an old boot under the bed. One day, Samuel decides to visit his parents and sends them a cable, which they never receive. He shows up and unknowingly surprises his parents who are ecstatic at seeing him. Samuel asks what his parents did with the money he sent him and Berl shows him where they keep it. Samuel is shocked and asks why and they tell him that they don't need the money. While in Lentshin, Samuel tries to find a need for the money but is unsuccessful. Everyone is happy to keep living their uneventful lives and simply live on what they have and what God has already provided for them.
Theme - Not everyone needs or wants money to be happy and people can just simply be content with where they are and what their lives are.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
"The Bet"
Protagonist - The lawyer because the whole conflict centers around him be it person vs. person or person vs. society.
Antagonist - Society because in the end the lawyer is going against every aspect of society. In person vs. person, the antagonist is the banker because in the beginning the lawyer is trying to prove him wrong. But the banker represents society so its still really person vs. society.
Conflict - Person vs. society because the lawyer is going against the belief that the life sentence is worse than the death penalty. The conflict is person vs. person if you don't dig too deep though because the the lawyer and the banker are opposing each other.
Antagonist - Society because in the end the lawyer is going against every aspect of society. In person vs. person, the antagonist is the banker because in the beginning the lawyer is trying to prove him wrong. But the banker represents society so its still really person vs. society.
Conflict - Person vs. society because the lawyer is going against the belief that the life sentence is worse than the death penalty. The conflict is person vs. person if you don't dig too deep though because the the lawyer and the banker are opposing each other.
Symbols - The banker represents society and the money represents greed and society.
Exposition - The banker and lawyer are arguing.
Inciting Event - The lawyer accepts the bet.
Rising Action - Everything between when the bet is made and when the banker is reading the letter.
Climax - The banker reads the letter.
Falling Action - Everything that happens between when the banker is finished reading the letter and whe he puts it in the safe.
Resolution - The banker puts the letter in the safe.
Themes - "The Bet" is really all about the meaning of freedom. The lawyer is technically not free to leave his surroundings if he wants the money but he is free in his mind and his choices. He could have chosen to leave the lodge at any time. He is free in his choice of books and food. He could still think his own thoughts. Freedom is being able to do what you want and he could've.
The meaning of home is also present in this story. Home is a place where you can be yourself and are comfortable. I'm sure the lawyer had all the anemities he needed to be happy and he didn't have to bother about visitors. Although, home can also be the people that are connected with that place. I know that my home would not be a home if it were not for the family that lives in it. The lawyer made a good hermit though, and was quite content to not associate with any other human being.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Vocab. Sentences
The recalcitrant teenager rarely showed up for school.
The mountains of Sweden are simply sublime.
My mother's garden is anything but verdant.
The girl had an acrimonious attitude towards her siblings.
May flies live a very ephemeral life.
The poodle was tremulous at the sight of the rottweiler.
The silhouette of the trees in the wind made eerie shapes on the ceiling.
Wendy is psychopathic and should detained and put in an insane asylum.
The vet had to sedate the dog for it's shots.
The ghost town was filled with desolation after all the inhabitants left.
The vet had to sedate the dog for it's shots.
The ghost town was filled with desolation after all the inhabitants left.
Monday, September 22, 2008
"The Thrill of the Grass"
Symbols: The baseball field symbolizes the man's love and his home. The old men that work in replacing the astro-turf symbolize nature, restoring the grass, "Nature temporarily defeated. But nature is patient."
The point of view is first person.
The inciting event is when the guy goes through the door into the ballpark and sees the artificial turf becuase that makes him mad and starts him creating the plan to replace the grass. The climax is the night when the old men show up to help get rid of the fake grass because that is the height of the action in the story and also the moment we realize what the outcome of the story will be.
Brief summary of "The Thrill of the Grass": It is summer of 1981 and the baseball players are on strike. One obsessive baseball fanatic, who remains unnamed, likes to visit the stadium even if he doesn't go any farther than the parking lot. One evening, as he is admiring the stadium, the nameless narrator spots a door cut into the fence. Being an experience locksmith, the man opens the door and steps into the ball field. He quickly notices the astro-turf that has replaced the real grass of the ballpark. He hates it. The man then concocts a plan to remove all the artificial grass and replace it with the real stuff. He acquires the help of another known baseball worshipper and, with their team of old men, begin to act. Night after night they work to restore the baseball field to its natural beauty and soon their work is complete. Now they can only sit and wait for the players to return to the field to see what their reactions will be.
This story is important becuase it shows us that we can change whatever we want to and make a difference no matter the odds. (Though I don't necessarily agree with that.)
The theme of "The Thrill of the Grass" is connected to home, freedom, and technology. The baseball park is like home to the narrator and he feels very strongly about it, even though its not a classic idea of "home". The astro-turf that has replaced the actual living grass in the field is technology and it has destroyed the narrator's idea of freedom, being able to feel and smell the real grass and get the real sense of home and baseball.
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Vocab. Words
insolence - The young boy showed his full capacity for insolence at the dinner.
churlish - Mr. Gilamardi had a churlish behavior towards his co-workers.
irate - My grandmother was irate when I didn't put the fork on the left.
efficacy - The college student had the efficacy to go on to do great things.
cajole - He cajoled the deer towards him with jam.
pummel - My brother was pummeled by the large teenager.
perspicacity - She had the perspicacity to differentiate between right and wrong.
chagrin - Jehosaphat was filled with chagrin after tripping on the stage.
assiduously - She did her homework assiduously, not even taking a food break.
maliciously - The football team had malicious intent towards the chess club.
churlish - Mr. Gilamardi had a churlish behavior towards his co-workers.
irate - My grandmother was irate when I didn't put the fork on the left.
efficacy - The college student had the efficacy to go on to do great things.
cajole - He cajoled the deer towards him with jam.
pummel - My brother was pummeled by the large teenager.
perspicacity - She had the perspicacity to differentiate between right and wrong.
chagrin - Jehosaphat was filled with chagrin after tripping on the stage.
assiduously - She did her homework assiduously, not even taking a food break.
maliciously - The football team had malicious intent towards the chess club.
Monday, September 15, 2008
"The Cold Equations." Is Marilyn to blame?
Marilyn, the young stowaway on the EDS in "The Cold Equation", is totally to blame for her own actions. She knew she wasn't allowed to be on that ship. Although she did not know the consequences of her actions, she is still at fault. Marilyn is 18 and should be responsible enough to take the blame. Besides, if the guy on the EDS lets her live, they will still probably die anyways due to lack of fuel, and if they can't reach their destination 6 other people will die. Is one life really more important than 6? She should realize that she would be making 6 other innocent people suffer and die, just for her own sake. Marilyn knows that she'll just be killing herself, the ship's pilot, and other unknowing people if she decides to be selfish and live for just a short while longer. She knows she made a huge mistake, as innocent as it may seem, and she should fully be responsible for it. No one wants her to die (except John), it's just that she caused the whole problem and should be the one to deal with it. She should be willing to die knowing that she is saving the lives of 6 sick people.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)